Escape Claws
by Barry Carter
Created:
Gravity is
attractive. Magnetic fields are also attractive, though they can be repulsive
to each other.
The law of attraction is somewhat universal but there is also a way to escape
from the gravitational and magnetic claws that hold us to the earth. I suspect
that are several ways we can escape these claws. One way might be to get the
earth to pull it's gravitational claws in. I think
that this happens when water levitates to the top of the tallest trees on earth
and is emitted from the pine needles.
Here is something that I posted, to the WhiteGold
list, about levitation in March of 2012:
Don Duke's plant assays showed that many of the plant and
animal tissues with the most ORMUS in them were associated with salt water.
These include shark cartilage, Ourco Nigel, Maritime
Pine Bark (Pycnogenol), ginco
extract and Blue-green Algae. Since "94 percent of life on Earth is
aquatic"
http://www.motherearthnews.com/Nature-Community/Fun-Surprising-Facts-About-The-Oceans.aspx#ixzz1qFJL7VFQ
and "Plant life in the ocean is very important to the survival of all
parties involved. Plants are the basis of the food chain for almost all
animals, mainly excluding those found in the deeper regions of the waters where
there is very little to no sun light available to plants (although it could be
argued that the only way the bacteria could survive to chemosynthesize
is by "breathing" the oxygen supplied by plants further up in the
ocean).":
http://techcenter.davidson.k12.nc.us/fall019/ocean/plantlife2.htm
and since ocean plant life is much more common toward the surface of ocean
water, it seems reasonable that they are supported by an abundance of ORMUS
elements near the ocean surface.
Furthermore, in each of his lectures, David Hudson proposed that the ORMUS
elements are biological superconductors. He cites several scientific papers
that support this claim. He obviously believes that some of the ORMUS elements
are superconductors because they levitate in magnetic fields. There is evidence
that biological superconductors also levitate in magnetic fields. Here is a
link to a page on insect chitin levitation:
http://www.ermetica.net/pk/?p=174
The bottom video on this page is quite a good illustration of biological
superconductive behavior. Notice how similar the "jumping" behavior
of the insect shell is to the jumping behavior of the jumping gold that Jim
made at:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/research/levitate.avi
Also see a similar superconductive behavior in the ORMUS white powder that
Charles Dragoo made from Azomite:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raDku8m4ovE
Here is a link to something I wrote on this topic a few years ago:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/levitation.htm
Here is a sound file on this topic:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/flyashall.mp3
And here is a link to a translation of Victor Grebennikov's
original chapter on levitation:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Grebennikov/Grebennikov-Eng.htm
If insects have the ORMUS minerals in their shells, then these insects must
have gotten these minerals from plants.
Have you ever wondered how water can get to the top of the tallest tree on
earth:
"The tallest tree in the world is a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), named Hyperion after a person in Greek
mythology. He is no less than 115.55 m (379.1 feet) tall!"
Capillary action is not good for more than 30 feet. I would like to suggest
that the same ORMUS elements that allow insect shells to levitate also help the
tree sap to levitate to the top of a 379.1 foot tall tree. If this hypothesis
is true, we might expect that other plants would grow taller when supplemented
with the ORMUS minerals.
The earth
was constituted by gravitational attraction of space particles. The earth's
constitution probably involved a rather large portion of the ORMUS elements.
This raises questions about how the levitating ORMUS elements can stick around
on the earth.
Jim invented his first magnetic levitation ORMUS traps in mid 1996. Here is a
link to a picture that I took of one of Jim's earliest traps:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/creektrap.jpg
And here is the link to a picture of the trap Jim used to concentrate ORMUS
from creek water for conversion to metal:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/impellertrap1.jpg
Pictures of some of the metal Jim made from trap water are linked, near the
bottom of the page, at:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/whyormus.htm
Here are pictures of more metal that Jim made from trap water:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Trap-Metal.jpg
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/trapmetal.jpg
I've also shared some evidence that sea water precipitate also is repelled
by magnetic fields. Here is something I wrote about this in June of 2011:
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:38:54 -0700
From: Barry Carter <bcarter@igc.org>
Subject: Settlement Gradient
Dear Friends,
Yesterday I cleaned under my dining room table for the first time in more than
a year. (There is no room on the table to dine as it is covered with stuff.)
When I looked under the table, with a flashlight, I noticed that an old bottle
of precipitate was sitting between the kitchen cabinets and a large, red, steel
can:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Dscn0332.jpg
Notice how the precipitate is sloped in the plastic milk bottle.
I did not do the Wet Method in this bottle. I probably did it in a wide-mouth,
glass gallon bottle. I precipitated this at least a year ago
and maybe four or five years ago.
I don't know whether I washed the precipitate or not. The most likely scenario
is that it was precipitate that I had put in a graduated cylinder to measure
the amount after it settled for a while. Here is a picture of the graduated
cylinder:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/Dscn0337.jpg
Notice that the glass is clear between about 950 ml and 1600 ml. The white below
950 ml is probably due to the fact that this is where the precipitate settled
to. The white above 1600 ml is probably the result of residue left as the water
evaporated from the top of the uncovered graduated cylinder. If this was the
source of the sloping precipitate in the gallon milk jug, it would match well
with the amount, as it looks like the milk jug is about a quarter full.
If the sloping precipitate in the milk jug is what I poured out of the
graduated cylinder then it is probably four or five years old and was open to
the air for a couple of those years.
My favorite hypothesis is that the precipitate has moved away from the
electromagnetic fields generated by my small counter-top oven and is cozying up
to the red steel can which gives it shielding from the computers that are on
the other side of the steel can.
Biological "superconductive" magnetic levitation is one quantum
behavior that has been reported with ORMUS concentrates. Another quantum
behavior is escape from sealed containers.
Here is
something I wrote about this in February of 2014:
The jury is still out on the role of salt in ORMUS alchemy
but I suspect that it plays a very important role. Here is a link to an article
I wrote on this in January of 2007:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/salt.htm
I suspect that salt provides a comfy home to the ORMUS diatoms or monatoms. I also suspect that all water contains a
significant amount of ORMUS. Perhaps as much as one eighth of the weight of
water is the ORMUS elements. If this is true, then the water itself also
provides a comfy home to the ORMUS units.
When we precipitate the white stuff from sea water or sea salt dissolved in
water, we get something that is about 70% magnesium. I suspect that ORMUS has
moved from the salt and water into a new comfy home in the magnesium
precipitate.
It seems likely to me that the ORMUS elements, in a solid form, prefer to
occupy cubic structures. Here is a quote on cubic crystal structures from Wikipedia:
"In crystallography, the cubic (or isometric) crystal system is a crystal
system where the unit cell is in the shape of a cube. This is one of the most
common and simplest shapes found in crystals and minerals." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_crystal_system
Lately I have been collecting plastic bottles to store parts and tools in.
Since my home workshop is in a small shed, I have been exploring ways to
increase the packing density of the shelves where I store my parts and tools:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/box2.jpg
Notice how the square containers on the left store more stuff in a smaller
space than the round containers on the right. Hexagonal containers also pack
more tightly than round containers.
I prefer clear plastic containers to opaque containers because it is helps me
to know what is inside. Labels also help but they are not always accurate. For
example, in the image at:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/box1.jpg
you can see that item 1 has a label on it but it is an empty box. Items 2 are
unlabeled and items 3 are containers for other stuff. The item 3 box on the
left contained the item 3 on the right which is a hard drive. The hard drive
contains a round disk which can store two terabytes of information. The label
on the left item 3 box says that it contains a hard drive with two terabytes of
capacity. The label on the right item 3 box says that it is a hard drive which
has the capacity to store 2 terabytes of information.
I could store about 2000 hours of video on the 2 terabyte drive but just
looking at the box that it is in, will give you no clue about what is in the
videos.
If ORMUS hides out in opaque molecular boxes which are unlabeled or that don't
contain what the label says, then we need to focus more on figuring out what
the box contains than what the current label says. For example, the common
label for water says H2O but we need to figure out what else is in the water
molecule box:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/box.htm
We also may wish to identify what else is in other things that contain
molecular boxes like salt crystals, rocks, air and biological tissue.
The shape of the molecular box and it's relative
transparency may also be important and provide some clues to what is contained
in it. Here is something I wrote on
David Hudson said that the ORMUS elements are "stealth atoms". By
this, he meant that they do not show up under conventional spectroscopic
analysis. In his patent he claims that the reason they do not show up is
because their valence electrons are all paired up so they are not available for
valence bonding (i.e. chemistry). Here is the germane statement on this from
Hudson's patent:
>Attempting to quantify the number of electrons remaining in an ORME is
extremely difficult due to the electrons lost to oxidation, thermal treatment,
and the inability, except from theory, to quantify electron pairs using
electron quanta. It is established, however, that the ORME does not have
valence electrons available for standard spectroscopic analysis such as atomic
absorption, emission spectroscopy or inductively coupled plasma
spectroscopy. Moreover, x-ray fluorescence or x-ray diffraction
spectrometry will not respond the same as they do with T-metals in standard
analysis.
This begs the question: since there are no valence electrons on the ORMUS
units, how does one extract them using chemistry?
I think that these little superconductors always have a Meissner
effect but that this effect is "hidden" when they are concealed in
certain places.
Jim always pointed out that the ORMUS "likes" quiet, tight places to
hide out. He used this property to "catch" ORMUS between the layers
of six microscope slides that were rubber banded together in a stack.
If this is true, why might ORMUS "seek" tight places?
My guess is that it seeks these tight places because the Meissner
effect drives them into retreat from magnetic fields. Thus, the ORMUS in water
would "seek out" the inside of icosahedral
water molecules which would provide some "protection" from the
magnetic fields in the environment. When salt is involved the ability of the
water to "hide" the ORMUS from magnetic field is further increased.
This is why I got real stupid when I first did the peroxide/HCl
method without salt. The ORMUS gold came out of the water into the air without
the "protection" of the salt in the water.
So, what are we doing with the chemical extractions from water or rock?
I think that we are just doing chemistry on the box that the ORMUS is hiding
out in. Imagine a very slippery greased bowling ball that has no holes to hang
onto. How do you pick it up? Easy, you roll it into a box and pick up the box.
I think that we are doing chemistry on the most likely hiding place for the
ORMUS and the ORMUS just comes along for the ride.
Now, if you get rid of one good hiding place--water--by drying your precipitate
you better be sure that you have another, better place for the ORMUS that is
still hiding in the water to go or you will loose that ORMUS portion.
In various places
What about the remaining magnesium precipitate?
Some ORMUS researchers believe that this is where the ORMUS likes to hang out
and that if you remove the magnesium you will again loose lots of the ORMUS
that does not fly away when you dry out your precipitate.
There is some indirect evidence that these hypotheses have some truth. If you
dry out the ocean water precipitate it no longer has any significant benefits
for plants even if it is rehydrated.
If ORMUS is naturally collected by the body in sufficient amounts that a cow or
pig will have 5% dry matter weight of m-rhodium and m-iridium in its brain
tissue then we can presume that the body has ways to get the most ORMUS out of
food, water and the air. This might be enough for all of the benefits we seek
from ORMUS if we did not do so many things to deplete it in our food, water and
air.
________________________________________________
We've got
some compelling evidence that ORMUS is in salt water, rocks and the air but the
jury is not yet in on how much ORMUS is in salt.
My first ORMUS experience happened when I tasted the drops of liquid which
escaped from a laboratory grade Nalgene container on
about
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/shielding.htm
Here is part of an email that I wrote on this topic:
From: Barry Carter <bcarter@igc.apc.org>
Date:
Subject: RE: Road Trip
I just spent three days with Jim working on ORMEs
with ozone. One of Jim's mine waste treatment proposals makes note of an
all-or-nothing phenomenon with ozone. He wrote:
"Ozone also commonly displays an "all or nothing" chemical
reaction behavior. This means that it is often slow to react with complex
organic materials until sufficient quantities are present, then
it will react with a nearly instant "flash oxidization". This
type of behavior occurs when treating difficult to oxidize species of heavy
metal, such as cadmium. Thus, the concentration and quality of ozone is
extremely important when treating difficult to oxidize compounds."
I am not sure that this all-or-nothing phenomenon is the operational model for
the conversion to gold gas that triggered the chest pressure that these people
mentioned. Here is what I think happened. As the ozone oxidizes more and more
of the gold in the chloride most of the energy of the ozone goes into this
initial oxidation process. When the all of the gold diatoms are oxidized it
seems that "suddenly" there is ozone available to
"energize" the existing gold diatoms and they start pumping up to a
higher energy level at this point.
I do not have a theory that would explain how ozone can energize gold that is
already diatomic but it seems that this happens. One of the things that
Jim maintains is a prime indicator of the ORME state is that the liquid starts
getting quite viscous. Jim calls it snotty. When this happens the easiest way
to identify it is to shake a sealed container of the gold ORME liquid and note
the behavior of bubbles in the liquid.
In ordinary gold chloride the bubbles behave pretty much like they do in a jar
of water; the bubbles rise quickly to the top of the liquid and pop. After we
had ozoned our gold chloride sample for about twenty
minutes a couple of times on Monday, we noticed that bubbles would cling to the
side of the bottle and would persist if the liquid level was tilted away from
them and then back to where it would cover them. This property became even more
pronounced on the second and third days that we ozoned
the samples.
On Tuesday we got some rhodium coated aluminum oxide pelets
that were destined for use as replacements for a Ford catalytic converter. We
placed a couple of cups of these pellets in a large flask and immersed them in
a weak hydrochloric acid solution. Then we ozoned
them over the course of a couple of hour long treatments per day for two days.
After the first ozone treatment, the liquid took on a dirty brown color. By the
third treatment the liquid was more of a clear orange brown. Just before
I left
Jim claims that the ORME materials like to attach themselves to aluminum oxide.
He often uses aluminum oxide dessicant pellets to
collect ORME vapors that might be driven off during the ozonation
process. Since the aluminum oxide remains in the bottom of the flask Jim says
that most of the rhodium ORMEs tend to collect in the
matrix around these aluminum oxide pellets.
Yesterday we poured most of the liquid above the pellet level into a couple of
125 ml Nalgene containers. When we shook these
containers the liquid looked very "snotty". Bubbles would form below
the surface of the liquid and when the bottle was tipped so that these bubbles
were above the surface of the liquid these bubbles persisted.
We noticed some gelatinous areas associated with the bubbles. All of the liquid
seemed to have more of the consistency of oil than of water or acid. I brought
these two identical samples of liquid off the top of the pellets back to
Jim has noticed that the ORME portion of this type of sample will "blow
off" when exposed to the changing magnetic fields during travel. In order
to shield the samples we placed them inside three nested "cookie"
tins that we bought at a thrift store. (We sat on the floor of the thrift store
and went through about twenty of these tins in an effort to find four that
would fit one inside of another. This would make a great scene in a movie ;-)
We put bubble wrap between each layer of metal so that each cookie tin was
magnetically isolated from the others.
When I got the two samples back to
We also shipped another set of samples with the above mentioned cookie tin
magnetic shield placed inside a disabled microwave oven. Microwave ovens are
also very effective magnetic shields. I will not know how effective this
additional magnetic shielding was until later.
It looks like it is possible to transport ORME materials but that they loose
energy and their properties change in the process. Perhaps the solid form is
more stable.
Jim claims that the best way to ingest these materials is by breathing the gas.
He says that since only the highest energy form will go off as a gas, this is
the form that will have the most immediate effect. I am not sure that I agree
with this and believe that it is just a theory that needs to be tested. Jim says
that several people who have breathed the gas coming off of some of his samples
have immediately had out of body experiences.
>Also, Barry has said that the gold gas cannot be contained. I wonder
>if Jim's ORME 'trap' could capture it?
Various ORME traps seem to capture them. The aluminum oxide pellets mentioned
above, magnetic shielding, and stacked microscope slides all seem to capture or
help capture the gold gas.
A couple of other items of note. During the three days
that we were working with these materials, seven people were exposed to
possible gold and rhodium ORME gas. Jim is the only person that noticed any
psychological effects. This does not necessarily mean that they would not have
happened if we had not been careful to avoid exposure to the gas. We were all
being careful to avoid contact with the gas since Jim says that it makes you
stupid for a while and we were all concerned that we not do anything do make
ourselves stupid when we were going to be driving.
Jim showed us some rhodium pellets that he "nuked" last year. These
pellets were in a clear liquid and had a fuzzy white powder surrounding them.
Jim said that this particular sample had been ozoned
dozens of times and that the white powder is what we can expect when we are
finished ozoning our rhodium and gold samples.
We videotaped the behavior of the bubbles in the viscous liquid from the
rhodium sample. If anyone has the resources to digitize video, I could send you
a SVHS tape of this and other phenomena so that you could digitize it and we
could share these images among ourselves.
With Kindest Regards,
Barry Carter
<bcarter@igc.apc.org>
___________________________
And here is
part of something I emailed another colleague on
I recently obtained about thirty samples of materials Jim
thought were interesting. A couple of samples stand out. (I have
compiled my notes on them into a database, if you think it would be of interest
to you I can send it along.) I have verified
some of Jim's observations with observations of my own. Jim claimed that
after he "nuked" (ozonated) a sample, if he
sealed the sample in a bottle and exposed the sealed bottle to a spinning
magnet, often droplets of something would appear on the outside of the
container on the side away from the magnetic stimulation. I witnessed
this happening. Jim claimed the sample was rhodium and iridium from a
catalytic converter, along with some gold chloride, converted to monoatomic by thirty minutes of ozonation.
It was a "fresh" batch in that Jim had just nuked it immediately
prior to my arival. Presumably, it was a sample
of monoatomic rhodium, gold and iridium in 25% HCl. He had me hold the 250 ml Nalgene
bottle with the sample while he moved a magnet under it. I noticed a
slight pull from the magnet. We put the bottle down and turned our backs
for about five minutes and the next time we looked at it, it had three or four
clear droplets on the top. Jim claimed that these droplets were oily, so
I got one on a finger and it was indeed oily. I tasted the tip of my
finger and it tasted very pleasantly sweet. I have tasted that same sweet
taste in bottled spring water. They both leave a pleasant sweet
aftertaste.
Jim also gave me some samples of dried material in petri
dishes. Most of these dishes were taped with electricians tape to keep
the lids on and the samples inside. I put 24 of these samples in the
plastic bag that the petri dishes came in and stacked
them upright in the back of my car. I drove them home (about 800 miles)
and when I opened the bag I noticed that there was some liquid on the inside of
the bag. I set the bag aside until I had a chance to look at it, about 2
days. When I went through the petri dishes I
found that several of them had a clear oily liquid (about the consistency of glycerine) between the petri
dishes. This liquid had the same pleasant sweet taste.
I pipetted the liquid from between the dishes into a
2 inch by half inch clear glass vial. I did the same with the liquid on
the inside of the plastic bag. When I pipetted
the material, it was so viscous that I could not blow it back out of the
pipette. I noticed some droplets of the, presumably, same liquid on the
inside of the lid of the 250 ml Nalgene container
that I mentioned previously. Assuming that this was probably the same
material, I sucked a drop of it into the pipette and immediately it reduced the
viscosity of the other material sufficiently that I was able to blow the rest
of the pipette sample into the clear glass vial. (When I, later, tasted
the liquid from the inside of the Nalgene container
lid, it tasted like acid.) I now have a sixteenth of an inch of this
liquid in the bottom of the vial.
This is confirmation of Jim's claims that the clear, "snotty"
material often goes through the lids of bottles and that it "likes"
to collect between layers of stuff. Another sample, I obtained from Jim,
is a stack of about 6 glass slides held together with a rubber band. Jim
claims that he uses these as an exposure meter to determine how much "monoatomic" gold gas has been released into the
room. The slide bundle I have looks like it has been dipped into some
salt brine and let dry. The stack of slides is in a taped petri dish. By shaking the petri
dish a bit, I was able to break off some of the material that was encrusting
the edges of the slides. These white to light gray flakes are mildly
magnetic. As is typical of these materials, the magnetic response builds over
the exposure time. I use a stacked pair of quarter inch diameter rare earth
magnet from Radio Shack to test for magnetic properties. Some of the
flakes are moderately magnetic the rest are very slightly magnetic. (By
magnetic I mean that they respond to a magnet, not that they have a magnetic
field of their own.)
Jim places great significance in the magnetic properties of these
materials. He has built half a dozen magnetic traps to stick in streams
in eastern
______________________________
On the page linked below, you can read another report
about ORMUS escaping. Most of this report was written by the lady who wrote the
Trap Water Diary:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/m-seeps.htm
The reports above suggest that ORMUS has a way to escape from the claws of
the molecular cages (which define it} into different molecular cages (which
define it differently). I suspect that the molecular escape process is similar
to the escape process from sealed containers, described above, and the escape
process that Sharon Rose has documented.
