In my deepest contemplations of all this, I see the central role of the
vacuum. The role of vacuum as Ultimate Tyrant is best seen in the work
of quantum/relativity cosmologists. It is the vacuum that determines
the observed charge on the electron (for example) and all the other
physical constants. These in turn determine the physics and chemistry
of the material universe and the conditions that life
(biochemistry-physiology) works within.
The medical project I work in daily has three premises that are in the
process of being demonstrated by experiment:
1. The Vacuum is not isotropic (i.e. there are structures in the
virtual particle flux)
2. Biosystems have an especially close relation with the Vacuum
3. Exploiting the close relation with the Vacuum, biosystems achieve
changes in the physical universe that on the 'dead' laboratory bench
are only achieved with high energy. (Eg sprouting seeds gain mass- a
'nuclear' process at room temperature)
So the bottom line is the coherence of the Vacuum, i.e. coherent
in the Vacuum, that affect matter. My lab work shows matter seriously
affected by an anisotropic Vacuum (read aether) causes predictable
changes in a target matter--typically to a covalent-grease
manifestation, i.e. long chain polymers, in material that normally will
not form polymers, eg ionic salts.
The ormus trap coheres the vacuum--sometimes very well and sometimes
not so well according to design and materials--and I would suggest, to
a lesser extent by timing. The work is the determination of the
material, geometric, E field, B field conditions that promote useful
coherence of the vacuum, since the coherence is affected by a lot of
factors. I think surfaces are important. This could be a long
discussion, but it seems to me that we cohere in our trap apparatus the
vacuum like the biosystem already does. (This is where 'traditional'
alchemy has become divorced from biology. How is distilling lead
acetate going to lead to alchemy? The people who use this stuff do not
understand the relationship between this salt and its aether parent).
I am thinking along the lines that:
The full moon/eclipse is essentially a gravitational issue--not lunar
reflected EM light. I can collect our white matter indoors, away from
actual moonlight from a water vortex tube as well as a dew condenser.
Ormus is also responsive to magnetic fields as well, as the vortrap
design itself makes use of.
My emerging view is that these two energy systems, gravitational and
magnetic fields, are carriers of ormus--bringing ormus in and out of
the strictly physical world.
In Gravity - when sun/moon/earth line up, there is more 'salt' in the
dew. In astrological terms, the two poles (sun/moon) are in
In Magnetic field - ormus stabilises in a magnetic field vacuum, i.e.
in magnetically shielded vessels. This is the breakdown of magnetic
field polarity we all usually do experimental work in. Perhaps a nil
magnetic field is a 'hole' in which ormus can manifest physically.
This last full moon, I have used an air vortex tube with magnets
similar to Barry's water tube,
and bubbled the separated cold air through various solutions. The
solutions were housed in mu metal jackets, as was the cold air tube
link. After bubbling through the solution, the air had to pass through
a ring magnet (to repel any ormus back into the solution). With di-ethyl ether digestion on the solution, I get
ormus grease, as from the water vortex tube. A 'blank' solution does
not give this. There is a catalytic matter in the air, as in
environmental waters. It is likely to be the same as the matter in dew.
Questions and Answers
Q. What is your air source?
Q, Are you using a standard vortex tube?
A. I had it manufactured in an engineering workshop according to
designs on the web. High velocity. I used 12 ring magnets around the
hot end of the tube and 8 discrete layers of mu metal around the cool
end of the tube. The tube is made of brass tube and turned solid brass
block, to allow for the magnetic fields from the magnets to penetrate
the interior of the tube unhindered. This is one reason why I didn't
use a standard vortex tube as they are usually stainless steel.
Q. How cold is your cold air?
A. 15-20 deg centigrade difference, but this is variable according to
how much air is returned to the cold end with the adjustable needle
Q. What is the humidity where you are?
A. 40-60%. Some water condensed (in ? and) around the vortex tube, but
was not a problem.
Q. Is your vortex horizontal or vertical?
A. Vertical, to align the vortexes with the gravitational field.
Q. Did you map out any time fluctuations?
A. No, not yet.
Q. I wonder if m-state enriched air can be pumped into a room or a
breathing apparatus, with beneficial effect, or compressed and stored
for later use.
A. I have been thinking along these lines also.
Q. I have yet to do a diethyl ether extraction.
How do you do this? Do you just shake, decant, and then let it
evaporate? Or do you recycle the ether? What relative volumes of water
and ether do you use?
A. Enough ether to saturate the solution and then some more to have a
floating layer 5 mm thick or so, is what I have used so far. Warm it
for a day or 2 at 40 deg cent., pipette the floating layer off and
evaporate/distil. The grease remains.
Ether floating on air trap water
Aqua regia is not the only way to dissolve gold. The alchemists used
'Mercury'. This is a confusing kind of technical term. As a solvent, it
is really about the fixation of the universal spirit in the air (also
called Universal Mercury, i.e. LIFE) onto matter from any of the three
kingdoms. It is a merging of Life energy and matter. The tangible
matter which is usually a salt, after the life spirit has been fixed on
it, has its chemical and physical properties seriously bent. A
sublimate from this union acquires a new property in that it can now
dissolve gold--no HCl/HNO3. Not a fantasy. Our group has done it
'Mercury' was never intended to be the silver liquid Hg metal. It
referred to the LIFE, whether intangible in space or as a tangible
oil/sublimate when bonded to matter. One generation after Paracelsus,
physicians prescribed Hg to be ingested for syphilis. Paracelsus cured
this disease with "Mercury", but he intended by this term the Life
principle, not Hg. He was addressing his disciples who knew what he
The Philosopher's Stone according to the crushing majority of
alchemical tracts is the result of a process. It is a process of
evolution through death and rebirth brought about by the captured
Mercury. It is clearly described as being NOT available to simply pick
up off the ground or extract--as ready-made Philosophers Stone. The
Mercury in the air, (read Life), when bonded to a matter gives a
'philosophical vitriol', a salt of unusual physico-chemical properties.
This is digested and it separates into a red and white 'Mercury'--as
oils, and a solid. These in union gave rise to the evolutionary process
described by so many alchemists. In fact it is the manipulation of the
white and red that is the beginning of most tracts. They assume you
already have these.
David Hudson's interpretation disallows by omission the thousands of
alchemists experiences and writings over the last 2500 years, who refer
to the Peter Pan like Mercury in the air as the centerpiece of the
praxis. Don't be hoodwinked into thinking that the DH interpretation of
the Philosopher's Stone says it all. It falls far short. Again, I say
the precipitate family has interesting properties. It may be a good
starting point in the evolutionary bit, not an end.